
A number of journalists have banded together to ask their editors if they can stop writing articles about hard-hitting TV drama Adolescence.
“Look, it was really good, no question,” said spokesman Dave Hack. “Powerful story, amazing acting (especially the kid), highlighting an important issue, so clever to film each episode all in one take, etc etc. Hats off to them.
“But frankly we’re running out of things to say about it. We’ve done scaremongering about ‘Do you know what your son’s viewing online?’, we’ve had thinkpieces about how to raise boys, we’ve had glossaries of what the various emojis mean, we’ve given endless free publicity to tossers like Andrew Tate… We’ve even concocted a pointless row about whether the producers were cowardly to make the killer white, when the suspect in the Southport murders (which the show wasn’t in any way based on) isn’t.”
“And I’ve written every possible version of ‘Male violence is every man’s fault, because it just is’” added Lucretia Harpy of the Guardian. ”And normally there’s nothing I like better, but there are limits.”
Their editors replied that unfortunately they need to continue producing more Adolescence-related material, at least until another show with similar impact is broadcast.
“And I don’t just mean the next Breaking Bad or The Wire - it needs to be a campaigning show aiming to right a societal wrong, which we can enthusiastically get behind despite showing no previous interest in the problem and in many cases actively contributing to it.”
Image: Pexels - Pixabay