top of page
Search

Welfare reform: parents to be responsible for their kids until they are 30



The government has today announced a further initiative to reform state welfare provision. In future, the government will make parents legally and financially responsible for their children until they reach the age of 30.


This means adults under 30 will be expected to live at home if they cannot afford their own place, and they will not be eligible for any state benefits.


‘Everyone thinks kids are cute,’ said a spokesman, ‘until they are old enough to have mobile phones and get stroppy.  Then it gets tougher.  We want to reinforce the responsibilities of parents in starting a family, and we want to avoid feckless Gen-Z snowflakes from clogging up the benefit system.  It’s costing us a fortune.


‘Parents usually know how to keep their kids in line – the naughty step, being grounded, star charts, removal of their bedroom door, etcetera – so we think that this is very doable.  It will also give the children a tremendous incentive to get jobs and earn enough money to get their own place.  There is only so much outdoor sex that you can have before you get caught.’


‘This will avoid all the tedious arguments about whether state benefits should cover one, two or three streaming services, for example.   And disagreements about whether the state should pay for Frosties and Cocoa Pops and Ready Brek and Multigrain Cheerios.  In future, all those discussions can be settled by the parents.  We respect that fact that different parents will reach different decisions. That’s quite acceptable in a democratic society.’


The initiative will generate massive savings on the welfare bill and ease pressures on social housing.


The government is also considering if children should be responsible for their elderly parents, once they are older than 75. This could generate big savings on the cost of care homes. This further initiative would provide a helpful counterbalance to the new policy on parental responsibility.  Parents would need to be reasonable with their children under 30, or they could face retribution once they are over 75.


Photo by Ben Wicks on Unsplash

Definitely not Nimbys says Tory Mayor



With Labour’s new housing targets looming over them, a Tory controlled council has gone into panic mode with the thought of their beautiful country town being overrun with peasants. Justin Case, the Tory Mayor told reporters, Our Town has remained untouched, unsullied for many years thanks to the massively high house prices and a hugely snobbish population and we need to keep it that way.


According to a secret report commissioned by the council, implementing Labour’s plan would involve a huge influx of very unpleasant people, none of whom even have of heard of Light Opera and would probably think The Pirates of Penzance was Johnny Depp’s latest film.


The report says, what these people want, is what they call Chippys, McDonalds Burgers, Betting shops and Pawnbrokers. It insists that with all the additional traffic from the intruders would result in doubling the ten minutes it currently takes to drive to the Golf course and is likely to result in a Nit Infestation in our local schools.


Matilda Shagweed whose family have lived in the town since they invested heavily in Thames Water insists that the townsfolk have nothing against the lower classes, but object to actually living with them. She believes the current system, based on the highly successful Johannesburg Soweto model already works exceedingly well. Help is bussed in, they do their hours and then thankfully go back to their own homes, where ever that is, at the end of the day. She said her Cook who lives a respectful twenty miles away ,has been with her for five years and besides some minor pilfering from the pantry has worked out very well.


The Mayor explained that Labour supporters, who He has publicly labelled as Russian backed Marxists, have put forward suggestions for social housing schemes to be built on what currently are a  disused brickworks and a former cement factory. Luckily, this is already designated as Green Belt Land and the council are currently in talks with Natural England to have both sites designated as Areas of Natural Beauty.


The mayor totally rejects the charge that they are acting like Nimbys, insisting that they are acting purely in defence of the countryside and that no true Englishman wants to look out of his conservatory window to see houses built with tax payers’ money while the value of his own home decreases hour by hour.


To prove their point the Tory council, again after careful consideration, have suggested areas far more suited to the Labour government’s plan, one in Scotland and one in Wales.




bottom of page