top of page

LOCAL POND - A mallard named Gerald has launched a furious public appeal to stop talking about the current cold, blustery conditions as 'Great Weather for Ducks' after the effects of Storm Boelo. Bystanders have described the accident as a strong gust of wind blew Gerald across the pond and into a hedge near the bus-shelter.


Gerald, speaking from a sheltered clump of weeds, said that while ducks famously do like 'a little bit of rain' - he drew a clear distinction between a calming drizzle and the gust-assisted downpour that has ruined the local duckweed.


'Every idiot with a Labrador is coming up to the pond and saying 'Bet you're loving this'.' said Gerald. 'No, Kevin, I am not bloody loving this. I am clinging to a bench leg. My feathers will take weeks to preen. I am not enjoying getting fired through the air like a wet shuttlecock!'


Local Councillor, Denise Harrow, has made a full consultation with her constituents both in and around the pond and has raised serious concerns about the foul language being used to the fowl. 'My constituents do enjoy the rain - this is true - however they do not enjoy torrential downpours, horizontal winds or local dog-walkers making weather comments while wearing rain-proofs. We are asking anyone in the area to pause all usage of Avian-based phrases until such time that Storm Boelo has passed.'


The council have provided a list of alternate phrases to use in the area of the pond on their website. These consist of 'miserable out', 'I hope the ducks are coping' and the French 'raining rope'.


Gerald, himself, has not ruled out 'raining cats and dogs' but thinks that it's not worth adding to the bill.



This weekend's clock change brings home what a farcical waste of time this exercise is.  As one householder said, 'It hardly makes any difference!  The sun isn't very bright at this time of year anyway, so an extra hour of it shining on my solar panels (if I'm lucky) barely earns me an extra quid.  And in the spring, I lose it again.  Or is it the other way round?  I always get confused.


'The whole idea's a bit mad - an utter con.  It's just a mind game.  What we need is something sensible and practical - something which will make a real difference, and which will save the planet.  What we ought to do is change the clocks every day.'


'If we moved the clocks one hour back every day at noon, we'd get an extra hour of sunlight every day.  And if we moved them forward again every night at midnight, we'd shorten every dark, miserable, un-productive and unprofitable sunless night by an hour, all year round.  That would be 365.2422 times more productive (yes, I've dome my homework, so I know what I'm talking about) and would also be simpler for the sun, which might otherwise get confused and get out of step with itself.'


The sun was unavailable for comment.




 

'This government is all about fixing the small stuff,' said a Cabinet Office spokesperson. 'And not just because we can't afford to do anything that matters. Stopping people blasting music on public transport - tick. Forty-five quid a year off your two grand gas and electricity bill - tick. Saying we'll end rough sleeping based simply on vibes - that's a big ol' tick. Now we're improving workplaces by getting rid of phrases which leave you wondering if you're emailing with a colleague or Satan himself.'


Not everyone has welcomed this change, as HR expert Jen Gray explained in writing.  


'Happy Friday!


Hope this email finds you well. Just checking in about my opposition to the new law banning the word-combos which empower office rockstars to synergize effectively. As per my last email, I don't have the bandwidth right now to fully double-click on why the new law is a hindrance to delivering at pace. Let's take this offline. Happy to discuss. Good luck with your future endeavours.


Warmly,


Jen'


The law comes into effect at midnight, following an easy run through Parliament with only the reintroduction of the death penalty for hitting 'Forward' on previously received emails and just adding 'Thoughts?' causing debate. 



bottom of page