Forum

The NewsBiscuit Community

Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten

1. 

   pinxit
   

   offline

   Member

   Just thought I'd share an interesting 48 hours I've had over at Twitter with a large company attempting to censor a satire of them, under the pretext of copyright.

   The skit involved was extremely mediocre, yet their hyper-sensitive reaction immediately following the decision to ban one of their TV by the ASA for misleading advertising bears all the hallmarks of corporate lashing out at individual satirists and critics.

   It has backfired spectacularly* on the egregious hipster loan sharks and served notice to other mega corporations who want to suppress parody and satirical criticism.

   MailOnLine

   Indy

   Bless ya, the combined Tweeps of Twitter! =]

   *It's now been RT'd over 35k times and been seen and favourited by over half a million! (estimated so far)

   Posted 3 years ago #

2. 

   Not Amused
   

   offline

   Member

   Yes, I've followed it !
   Hopefully they will back off now .. well done !

   Posted 3 years ago #

3. 

   godly1966
   

   offline

   Member

   Any loan companies that charges 5,853% APR interest are all a bunch of complete WANKERS. I am sure that's not liable. I didn't even mention WONGA. WONGA WANKER it's an easy mistake to make.

   Posted 3 years ago #

4. 

   

   Wrenfoe
   

   offline

   Member

   I'm surprised we got away with this one then...

   http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2013/07/25/wonga-com-offers-to-save-souls/

   Posted 3 years ago #

5. 

   Electrelane
   

   offline

   Member

   I like the way the Mail had to explain who Hogarth was.

   Posted 3 years ago #

6. 

   Oxbridge
   

   offline

   Member

   I'm slow on the uptake and I don't do Twatter, so apologies, are you this BrandySnap character? Many congrats on this one.

   Posted 3 years ago #

7. 

   deceangli
   

   offline

   Member

   Never mind Wonga, this Hogarth dude has grounds to sue

   Posted 3 years ago #

8. 

   Squudge
   

   offline

   Member

   Well done Pinxit.

   My sad effort at poking the embers didn't even get a single re-tweet.
   Flash aha

   I must admit I feel some sympathy for the lawyers, as they were only doing what they were paid (amply) for. No sympathy for any sock-puppetry finance company that charges APR in the 1000s%

   Posted 3 years ago #

9. 

   throngsman
   

   offline

   Member

   If they do sue, you can probably get a payday loan to cover the legal fees.

   Posted 3 years ago #

10. 

    pinxit
    

    offline

    Member

    Update! Received a direct message from Wonga and Twitter today. Here's their statement...

    VICTORY!

    Thanks all. =]

    Posted 3 years ago #

11. 

    Not Amused
    

    offline

    Member

    Congrats pinx...

    Posted 3 years ago #

12. 

    pinxit
    

    offline

    Member

    Thanks NA. Mail has picked up their backdown, still no sign of apology to Twitter users though for the nerve to try and censor on spurious grounds.

    MailOnLine

    A few other perhaps salient points to be made.

    1.) The takedown censorship began just a day after their TV ad had been banned by the ASA.
    2.) A new PR guy took over on the very day I broke the story to Twitter. (Previously he was an anti-payday loans campaigner!?)
    3.) Their egregious legal dept (who they now themselves call 'soulless' and 'heavy handed') Let a junior (intern perhaps?) who is straight out of Law school put his name to the takedown notice. The poor sod is now carrying the can for his masters. That cannot be right.

    Still, onwards and ooopwards ladies and gentlemen!

    Posted 3 years ago #

13. 

    The All New Jeni B
    

    offline

    Member

    Hmmmm, a trainee solicitor straight out of law school should never be told to put their name to anything of that nature, and in fact, should spend the two years of their traineeship being told not to get themselves into that sort of situation.

    Sounds like their lawyers (do you know if they're 'in-house' or a firm is retained?) have a lot to answer for, but there should still have been 'the nod' from someone at boardroom level in Wonga before they issued anything.

    Congratulations on your victory Pinxit, stick it to 'The Man'!

    Posted 3 years ago #

14. 

    pinxit
    

    offline

    Member

    Thanks Jeni. Are you familiar with Legal Cheek, the online legal satire mag? ( @legalcheek )

    They've run a story about it here.

    Posted 3 years ago #

15. 

    The All New Jeni B
    

    offline

    Member

    I am, but haven't popped by for quite a while.

    Thanks for the reminder!

    Posted 3 years ago #

16. 

    Squudge
    

    offline

    Member

    Well done Pinxit - a comprehensive victory

    All we need now is Babs Streisand's agents to sue Wonga for their whimsical portrait on that Open Wonga link.

    Posted 3 years ago #

17. 

    Titus
    

    offline

    Member

    "Are you familiar with Legal Cheek, the online legal satire mag?"

    I wasn't, but I am now, and thank you!

    I love this, which is superb NewsBiscuit style:

    http://www.legalcheek.com/2013/12/the-something-must-be-done-act-2014/

    Posted 3 years ago #

18. 

    editor
    

    offline

    Administrator

    Well done Pinxit/Brandy Snap! A lot of shouting coming from the offices of the Wonga PR department right now...

    Posted 3 years ago #

19. 

    pinxit
    

    offline

    Member

    Thanks all - and thanks Nice Admin Ed. It was a pretty mediocre skit, but, as someone kindly pointed out, it stung them. =]

    Posted 3 years ago #

20. 

    ianslat
    

    offline

    Member

    Good result.

    I assume Wonga advertise on Twitter do they?

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.