Forum

The NewsBiscuit Community

Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten

1. 

   TobiasBV
   

   offline

   Member

   I'm pretty new around here, and I'm wondering - who are the editors? What's the process? I've had a few pieces published so far and they're often changed quite a bit (often for the better, I don't want this to sound like a complaint!)
   Also, what are other people's experiences of having their stuff edited? Does it ever feel that it hurts the piece or that bits you particularly like are taken away?

   Posted 6 months ago #
2. 

   sponge finger
   

   offline

   Member

   They don't consult you about it, or ping you an explanation (unlike a couple of the other satire sites), so maybe can feel a bit 'cold'.

   Not that I've done anything worth the mention, but this is the experience of a biscuit or two I've chatted with.

   As to 'who', I couldn't tell you.

   Posted 6 months ago #
3. 

   Robopop
   

   offline

   Member

   You can read all about how this place works, here Tobias.

   As for having your subs edited, well it's the nature of the business. I'm fairly new here myself, but I've had a few pieces make FP and all were buffed-up for the better. Had plenty of sentences taken out here and there, and even a paragraph removed. I can honestly say that it didn't hurt a bit. Well, not like a finger up the arse, anyway. (So I've been told)

   Posted 6 months ago #
4. 

   Oxbridge
   

   offline

   Member

   Basically, JOF, a few others who were in at the start and those who've barged their way onto the top table through long years of subbing and getting stuff used. Some more people also do Nibs only.

   As regards having subs edited, Robopop is right - sometimes you may think it improves what you wrote, sometimes you don't, that's the name of the game. Whenever an editor edits something down, it is usually for house style (e.g. the existing piece is too long) or because s/he thinks of something worth adding in.

   Posted 6 months ago #
5. 

   NewBiscuit
   

   offline

   Member

   The only thing I can claim any credit for that made it to an FP started as a throwaway comment on another sub. I then went offline for a week and came back to find that it had been reposted & expanded as a new sub by another poster, got stars and many comments, and then re-written again into a FP by the eds. The end result was funny. My input to the process was almost zero, but I got all the credit (writer of the month!!) so I thought it best not to complain too loudly.

   Posted 6 months ago #
6. 

   sydalg
   

   offline

   Member

   Does JOF do some editing? I didn't know he had any direct input into the articles.

   Posted 6 months ago #
7. 

   beau-jolly
   

   offline

   Member

   I heard there was an infinite number of monkeys. Is that not true?

   Posted 6 months ago #
8. 

   Wrenfoe
   

   offline

   Member

   There's a rotation of editors. As Oxbridge mentioned, the person editing The NiBs may be different from the person doing the FPs that week. Naturally, funny material always gets noticed but being published can often be down to that editor's taste in humour (or about the balance of articles over the week).

   My tip is don't try to find too much logic in it - that way lies madness!!! :D

   Posted 6 months ago #
9. 

   nickb
   

   offline

   Member

   You write em. Sometimes they fuck about with em. Sometimes not. Sometimes the fucking about is an improvement. Sometimes not. All proper writing is collaborative, I would say. That is why a lot of blogs are so shit.

   Posted 6 months ago #
10. 

    FOAD
    

    offline

    Member

    "the person editing The NiBs may be different from the person doing the FPs that week. Naturally, funny material always gets noticed but being published can often be down to that editor's taste in humour..."

    
    So, there's a badger, a puffin and a squirrel, then.

    Posted 6 months ago #
11. 

    Oxbridge
    

    offline

    Member

    And, of course, editors' tastes vary. So, no matter what Mr Troll might think of it, if you are confident in something you've written* and it isn't achingly topical, recycle it later. It might work.

    * - Not 'Back up your brain', though, obviously

    Posted 6 months ago #
12. 

    AReader
    

    offline

    Member

    I've had a couple of NIBs and both were edited to be funnier and more focussed. I think its fascinating to see how a half-decent sub can be improved by a professional comedy writer.

    I don't have the time to take comedy writing seriously enough.

    Posted 6 months ago #
13. 

    nickb
    

    offline

    Member

    Never take comedy writing seriously, Areader. That is where you are going wrong. Take serious writing seriously, by all means. K

    Posted 6 months ago #
14. 

    Kevin the Swan
    

    offline

    Member

    FOAD - don't forget the hamster.

    Posted 6 months ago #
15. 

    FOAD
    

    offline

    Member

    As Richard Gere used to say.

    Posted 6 months ago #
16. 

    Stan Laurel
    

    offline

    Member

    Does JOF do some editing? I didn't know he had any direct input into the articles.

    
    Sydalg, answer is yes.

    I think its fascinating to see how a half-decent sub can be improved by a professional comedy writer.

    
    AReader, answer is not all of the editors are professional comedy writers. I know this for a fact.

    Posted 6 months ago #
17. 

    Titus
    

    offline

    Member

    The only time to take comedy writing seriously is when your contributions are ignored or rejected, when it is of course essential to storm off in a huff. That, at least, will give everyone a laugh.

    Posted 6 months ago #
18. 

    tewsberry
    

    offline

    Inactive

    AReader has had a couple of NiBs? Gad! Is this where we are? Can it really? Gordon Helicoil, it makes one weep.

    Posted 6 months ago #
19. 

    godly1966
    

    offline

    Member

    If you PM the admin with your credit card details you should make the front page.

    Posted 6 months ago #
20. 

    NewBiscuit
    

    offline

    Member

    I heard there was an infinite number of monkeys. Is that not true?

    This is true, given the following assumptions:
    1) Time will continue to infinity
    2) Monkeys will continue to exist
    3) You are counting all monkeys that exist or will exist in future, rather than counting them at a single point in time

    Note that there are no such assumptions required regarding 'typewriters', which is just as well as they have almost ceased to exist already. :)

    Posted 6 months ago #
21. 

    beau-jolly
    

    offline

    Member

    So the editing isn't done by an infinite number of monkeys then? I'm rather disapointed at that. Ah well.

    Posted 6 months ago #
22. 

    Titus
    

    offline

    Member

    "So the editing isn't done by an infinite number of monkeys then?"

    No, that's us writers, not the editors.

    Posted 6 months ago #
23. 

    nickb
    

    offline

    Member

    I am fed up with infinite monkeys. Infinite monkeys has become a cliche

    Posted 6 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.