He conveniently ignores that the USA's greed for/dependence on/love affair with oil drives the industry in the first place.
They say power corrupts etc.
Mini rant over.
Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten
He conveniently ignores that the USA's greed for/dependence on/love affair with oil drives the industry in the first place.
They say power corrupts etc.
Mini rant over.
Go back to Pyongyang, Tojo, Jr. (I love the person who tagged "Texas Tea" by the way.)
I wish I'd kept the quote I saw the other day from some Palinesque loon. It was along the lines of "this disaster in the gulf has only happened because Obama and other tree-hugging environmentalists have made it so difficult for us to drill for oil on land." Amazing.
I always knew you loved me really Rikkor. xxx
Anyone remember the Beverly Hillbillies? A blast from the past.
take your shoes off...
Can we get real? Obama is probably very aware of the need to reduce dependence on oil - even Dubya seemed to be on the verge of getting that - but he's not a miracle-worker and that isn't going to change overnight. The poor man still has to share a country with the Palin-esque loons.
He's not the President, he's a very naughty boy...
Hmm...you fill your motors with petrol, which must be totally different from filling our cars with gasoline. Sounds much greener and much less fossil-fuelly at the very least.

Helps if you stun them before trying to squeeze 'em down that tiny aperture, mind.
The point of the currency crisis is that Iran and Latin American countries value their oil in "a basket of currencies" which includes the Euro. The point of "peak" oil is that it is worth more in the ground - leveraged - than it is at the pump. When oil is leveraged, derivatised, securitised and the money spent on other more interesting things,banks collect fees, and petrol prices stay high. When you take oil out of the ground you have to refine it - unless! - unless! - you lose it at sea until things settle down a bit and it can be slightly de-leveraged to pay for refinery capacity, erm, well in dollarii if the UK can ever manage to refloat stirling the way it had been promised.
Did I post this on the wrong thread? Oh bother..
I'm going to have a word with the editor, and see if we can get all the economics posts deleted and the old "tits in mangles" ones put back.
Rick, I completely agree. In support of your initiative, I will send a photo of my massive, engorged member to anyone who requests such.
You must log in to post.