Controversy is raging in the gurning world over the kinds of gurns that should be allowed and which should be banned.
The rules of gurning, which started out as speed dating for ugly people, were set out many years ago but have been amended over time. The second amendment enshrines the right of anyone, whether ugly or not, to gurn.
Gurn control advocates, such as Pires Morgran have pointed out that gurning should be a deliberate intentional act and that automatic or semi-automatic gurning, where a 'not so ugly' gurner flicks their face around in random movements, are not necessary and should be banned.
Roger Moore, chairman of the anti-gurning league, who refuses to allow his face to move at all, said that at a recent meeting traditional gurners looked apoplectic but that might just have been part of their warm up.