Forum

The NewsBiscuit Community

Sign up or log in - lost password?

Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten

2013 already poised to go and fuck itself


(27 posts) (13 voices)
  • Started 5 months ago by Oxbridge
  • Latest reply from No No Feckin No
Current rating::

Tags:

  • 20/20
  • 2012
  • 2013
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • 2016
  • 2017
  • 2018
  • 2019
  • 2021
  • 2022
  • 2023
  • 2024
  • 2025
  • 2026
  • 2027
  • 2028 is it funny yet
  • 2029 No
  • 2030
  • AReader is JohnA
  • Bob is a builder
  • Bob is your uncle
  • Bourbon is a biscuit
  • Bourbon is Wayland Smithy
  • Bourbon isn't Wayland
  • Britain
  • Cancer is funnier than Saltire
  • coalition
  • flounce
  • Government
  • Like Yoda tagger speaks
  • Olympics
  • Oxbridge is a lazy prick
  • Oxbridge is ironically stupid
  • Oxbridge isn't funny
  • Oxflounce
  • Oxy is custard cream
  • Pope is a catholic
  • Saltire is funnier than Oxbridge
  • spoof news
  • swearing instead of jokes
  • swearing is clever
  • there saved you the bother
  • Wayland has fallen by the wayside
  • Wayland is a porkpie
  • wayland’s not as funny as Saltire
  1. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Even before it actually began, the year 2013 has been preparing to accede to the wishes of the vast majority of Britain's 60 million hacked off inhabitants. With nothing remotely good at all likely to happen during its 365 days, 2013 has bought a stout pair of hiking boots so that it can fuck right off, borrowed a rope to enable it to just fucking die and grown both male and female genitalia so that it can go fuck itself.

    'I can only apologise,' said 2013, 'but I have nothing to offer Britain except unemployment, pissing rain, Manchester United back on top of the league and the remote but still scary possibility that the US actally will deport Piers Morgan back here. In the circumstances, I would probably avoid happening altogether if I could. Unfortunately, the space-time continuum appears to make that impossible.'

    Britain has told the three years since the downturn began to do one in increasingly venomous terms. 2011, for instance, is now permanently disabled after agreeing to demands to shove the coalition up its arse, while 2009 died after a failed operation to extricte the entire banking industry from its own.

    2012 was grudgingly given a chance. However, the brief feeling of contentment caused by people in lycra cycling quite well has now passed, to be replaced by profound gloom at the realisation that they are actually going to celebrate the Diamond Jubilee of the frigging coronation.

    'All I'll say in my defence is you may as well sit through me,' said 2013. 'After all, 2014: the usual World Cup exit on penalties in the quarter final, Scotland votes for independence, meaning a big Tory majority in 2015 and probably forever after. And all in the same year as the 600th anniversary of Agincourt and the 200th anniversary of Waterloo. Oooh, the Daily Mail is going to love that. Think on.'

    Posted 5 months ago #
  2. Tripod

    offline
    Member

    I like an optimist. Stars...

    Posted 5 months ago #
  3. The All New Jeni B

    offline
    Member

    Glass half-fucked off.

    Personally, I can't wait to see 2012 fuck right off, it's been a shite of a year and Tuesday cannot come quickly enough.

    Having said that, by this point in time next year, I'll have lived with a teenager for an entire year and will probably not notice how the year has been due to my increasing dependency on prescription medication.

    Stars.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  4. AReader

    offline
    Member

    Too much anger to be funny. But satirical and sarcastic enough.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  5. dvo4fun

    offline
    Member

    Mmm ... I'm getting 'Eeyore' with - I may be wrong but - perhaps just a hint of 'Marvin'?

    And a chuckle or two

    Posted 5 months ago #
  6. sigmund

    offline
    Member

    a pedant writes; I completely get the sentiment, but the banking crisis started in 2007, (Northern Rock) so we’ve been stuffed for over 5 years, now. Have 5 death-stars to cheer yourself up.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  7. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Didn't work. Sorry, didn't fucking work.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  8. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    There's always next year. In fact you could do this every year until it gets used.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  9. Idiot

    offline
    Member

    Just the right amount of venomous bile for my tastes. More of it please . *****

    Posted 5 months ago #
  10. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Good idea Bourbon. And if that doesn't work, I'll just take a leaf out of your book and become a troll instead.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  11. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    Define troll. An irritant I may be, but not a troll dear oxy. I just made a point that you could try again next year. You said you like to recycle so not sure of your issue.

    Anyway, happy new year!

    Ah, and I'm not W/smithy. I am bourbon. That's like saying oxy is custard cream, oh hold on, I might be onto something here...

    Posted 5 months ago #
  12. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Nope, I'm just Oxbridge, I have not used any other IDs and have no plans to. No idea who Custard Cream is or whether you or Wayland use any others.

    Yes, it is slighly irritating when people make a big issue of my 'recycling' - although that's not really an accurate term, since I almost always update or otherwise modify them, hence re-posting rather than just bumping the original up. It's no big deal, lots of people do it and some of my FPs have made it at the 3rd attempt, which is the most I usually try. My November one about the US election, which was second for WotM, was recycled from a couple of months earlier. Lots of good stuff gets overlooked because there just happened to be something else the editor of the day liked better.

    It's also slightly irritating and a bit bizarre that someone who I've never met (he know who he is and it isn't Bourbon, for the record) automatically one-stars everything I write and adds in most of the 'witty' tags, but there you go. I assume that's all meant to provoke a flounce from me. It won't.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  13. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    Nobody is making a 'big issue' out of it other than you. I just pointed out you could use it again, which is something you said you like to do.

    Nice rant though, although it comes across as a little needy and 'I'm a victim'. Do you feel better?

    Posted 5 months ago #
  14. Vertically Challenged Giant

    offline
    Member

    I’m sure you’ve made that comment before Oxy but I can’t find the original.

    I have a theory that the person that one-stars everything you post is doing it in response to you five-starring your stories as soon as you sub them. I may be completely wrong of course, but next time you post something try leaving it un-starred and see if they still give it one (snigger).

    If they do then log back in and give it 5 to get the rating back up.

    I don’t think there’s anything wrong with scoring your own subs by the way. I do think it’s a little unnecessary though, because it should go without saying that you think it’s good, otherwise why have you posted it?

    Posted 5 months ago #
  15. Yikes

    offline
    Member

    5 starring one's own subs does seem a little pointless - as I suppose is one starring such posts as a counter-balance.

    Anyway, I have a question re tags - I notice some stories (including I think this one) are posted with tags. Is the idea of this to help the editor if the story is chosen for the FP? If the answer is yes, should most stories be posted with tags?

    Posted 5 months ago #
  16. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Seems a bit playground-y to say 'you started it', but in this instance, Bourbon, you did. I never have. Maybe the recycling issue might have died away if I had decided not to respond at all, but then again maybe not. Mr 1-star troll has been at it for years now, after all.

    Yikes - yes, that's what tags are meant to be for and they should ideally all be tagged. That's the theory anyway.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  17. beau-jolly

    offline
    Member

    Please try harder. This was almost the first flounce of the year but sort of fizzled out.
    I am surpised to say that I have been enjoying Bourbon's contributions. (s)he's got a niave innocence and is a biscuit who doesn't take him/herself too seriously. I have not seen anything nasty or malicious. No trollery at all.

    wrt to any self-starring. Does this really happen? Why would you?

    Posted 5 months ago #
  18. Vertically Challenged Giant

    offline
    Member

    Stories posted on the FP have tags at the bottom of them, I assume that means whoever is editing the FP stories has to assign the tags. Putting them on your original sub would help them because then they can just use the tags from there.

    I generally don’t put tags on my stories but have done a couple of times. One of those subs was used on the FP but the tags I’d put on it weren’t used. So I spat my dummy out and stopped putting tags on again.

    Given that WoM is awarded to the story with the most hits, if the tags from the original sub were used on any stories used on the FP then it could make for some interesting use of tags.

    Hmm... I’m going to go back through and tag my mild-mannered reporter story, just in case it gets used.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  19. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    You started it.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  20. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    Did not. I'm telling John of you.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  21. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    You could use the same letter you wrote to him last time ;)

    Posted 5 months ago #
  22. Oxbridge

    offline
    Member

    My dad's bigger than yours too.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  23. The All New Jeni B

    offline
    Member

    That's enough boys.
    Play nicely, or I'll take your internet away.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  24. Bourbon

    offline
    Member

    You should concentrate on peeing when at the urinal

    Oxy that is, not you Mrs B

    Posted 5 months ago #
  25. The All New Jeni B

    offline
    Member

    Thanks for clarifying Bourbon, my cheeky little biscuit.

    I thought you'd caught me out again.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  26. Dawsons creek

    offline
    Member

    The langauge is a bit OTT, I was a bit offened if I'm going to be honest about it.

    Posted 5 months ago #
  27. No No Feckin No

    offline
    Member

    No,no,feckin no,Oxbridge.

    Posted 5 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.