I know I know.
Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten
Computing power increased by a third by introduction "3" to binary
(15 posts) (11 voices)
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
I think that would be 2, not 3.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Who's a clever boy then?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Haha! That would be a "2" not a three, good point rikkor.
Same joke, but what he said.
Posted 2 years ago # -
And a 50% increase, not a third?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Isn't this just the ternary system, which has been around in computing since Thomas Fowler built a calculating machine entirely from wood in 1840?
Of course, the only modern equivalent was Nikolay Brusentsov's Setun, built in the late 50s.
Many people assume that ternary computing will never catch on, but experts such as Donald Knuth believe the elegance of ternary logic could bring it back into vogue. As a facile example, a ternary computer making use of fibre optics could obviously use dark as 0 and two orthogonal polarizations of light as 1 and -1.
Anyway, I think this joke was done a while ago in the "Potential fibre optic ternary computer could increase computing power by 50%, say experts" FP from last year, wasn't it?
Posted 2 years ago # -
So if you use -1,0 and +1; surely that means computing power has dropped to zero if you add them up?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Computing power increased ten-fold by adding 'i' before the name. (Kicks hornet's nest, runs away).
Posted 2 years ago # -
There are only 10 types of people in the world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Slightly off topic but Steve Burt, advert at the top of this page, needs to learn how to stop spelling 'probably'.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I'm pretty sure that his advert will now never show up ever again, just so that I look a fool. Correction, even more of a fool than normal.
Posted 2 years ago # -
And still putting Micro$oft Windows on it would make it run at the speed of a ZX81 :-(
Posted 2 years ago # -
I just keep getting the investor resource one now; and since I don't have a £250,000 portfolio, I'm not finding it particularly useful.
Posted 2 years ago # -
apart from the spelling of 'probably', which I got, is this the brainiest NB thread ever?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Yes. We have set our (web)sites low enough.
Posted 2 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.
