He went to see his brother ? a brother is more likely to give a false alibi than parents ,he is am architect ,very smart very methodical all planned out ,the only thing missing is a blue rinse
Quick links: NewsBiscuit Home • Chat Room • Writers' Room • Top Ten
Did the boyfriend do it ?
(25 posts) (15 voices)
-
that would explain why in his first interview after reporting her missing he said "she 'was' my future"
google cruel says:
Is it over? Chat with a professional psychic!however the add vanished as soon as I added the comment of google cruel. They must hasve a professional psy-chick working at google
Posted 10 years ago # -
Just don't come here much anymore - works for me! :-)
Posted 10 years ago # -
The 'Barry George on stand-by' one-liner said it all. Every time the tabloid media feast on a murder (usually of a pretty young woman, preferably blonde), there is this hideous lather of innuendo, hints and overt pressure on the police.
Result: the local nutters, eccentrics and ne'er-do-wells all get rounded up and the one who can't account for his whereabouts and/or 'looks right' gets hounded into making a false confession or is otherwise fitted up for it. The Daily Mail looked to have got its pound of flesh in Christopher Jeffries - for whom read Barry George, Michael Stone and many more in days gone by - the only difference being that Jeffries is educated and intelligent enough to face them down.
This country is sick.
Posted 10 years ago # -
It is rather entertaining to swoop back here for a moment to find that satirists who rely on stereotyping for their effects have come out to unequivocally defend Plod stereotyping, aka "profiling" as a crime solving device. My own "profiling" methods indicated to me that, on the face of it, the neighbour was a more likely suspect than the poor chap on whom the Daily Mail pounced. Jeffries was far too exotic to be an "obvious" or "usual" suspect.
Posted 10 years ago # -
Just a note on profiling - despite it's glamorisation in TV programmes such as 'cracker' and 'criminal minds', psychological profiling plays a significant role in less than 15 - 20% of serious criminal convictions (UK & US averages). The police tend to prefer hard evidence to a method that can be sometimes be little better than phrenology in its accuracy. Statistically, the great majority of murders are committed by people known to the victim - family members, friends, colleagues, landlords et al. So, perhaps the police weren't too misguided in taking a hard look at Jeffries.
Posted 10 years ago # -
George Carlin said it well ,don't be afraid of strangers ,it's someone you know that will probably kill ya.
If she had met someone off face book there would have been records of any interaction between her and the killer ...
A lot of people have got away with murder ,because the police did not not thoroughly check out the Alibi.Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.