There was a guy, yeah, he tried to stop an investigation into Russian state interference in his election, an investigation which found that there had been Russian state interference in his election, hundreds of contacts between his campaign and Russian operatives, and resulted in several prison sentences, all of which he then claimed was a hoax...
...now, was he the guy who’s trying to avoid an investigation into Russian state interference by claiming that “We have seen no evidence of successful interference in the EU referendum” on the back of an ISC report that said the Government “had not seen or sought evidence of successful interference in UK democratic processes,”?
You don't really think that Tithead is going to respond to that in an intelligent way, do you?