<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=57278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Username on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-166033</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Username</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">166033@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Headline is strong enough to stand as a ticker, but the story doesn't really develop the ideas. Headline, though, is brilliant.5*
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squudge on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-166004</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Squudge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">166004@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Nice thought - I am pretty sure Cameron has been viewing the Coalition as a sub-standard election win for some time
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Titus on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-166001</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Titus</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">166001@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Lots of good ideas there.  A recent court case involving sub-standard truthfulness comes to mind.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Could even be extended to Eastleigh where the Conservatives experienced a sub-standard victory.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squudge on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-165990</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Squudge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">165990@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;After a short period of quiet reflection, I have to say NO
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlies_hat on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-165987</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>charlies_hat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">165987@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm enjoying his pain. Is that a sin?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squudge on "Cardinal sins to be reclassified as sub-standard virtues"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=57278#post-165981</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Squudge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">165981@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;The apology by Cardinal Keith O'Brien in response to non-specific allegations, where he admitted to below-standard sexual conduct, has inspired a review of offences. HR, ecumenical and legal professionals are all celebrating the proposed new terminology. &#34;Really it is an enormous relief that it is all down to standards&#34; said Malcolm Pomeroy, chief standards advisor to the non-governmental Advisory Committee on Standards. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Police are being encouraged to re-classify any offences that are a bit 'rapey' as 'sub-standard sexual conduct'. This opens up the prospect of government targets where less rapey metrics can be set as critical success factors. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The clergy are said to be responding warmly to the re-designation as a sliding scale of sub-standards can be more readily matched to acts of contrition. Goosing under the cassocks of fellow priests can be a certain number of Hail Marys, perhaps with a bonus pennance during Lent, when priests traditionally abstain from choirboys and other cardinals bottoms.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;MPs meanwhile are advocating expense fraud to be re-considered as 'sub-standard fiscal conduct'.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Seeking clarity, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has asked the standards committee to consider a similar re-classification for other violent crimes. &#34;For consistency, we would like murder and manslaugher to sound a bit less killy for when the crime statistics come out, perhaps 'below-standard violent conduct' could be the charge&#34;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
