<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=56507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Lens Cap on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163430</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lens Cap</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163430@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Nice, agree a bit with truebiscuit, but the execution was good and raised a smile
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Truebiscuit on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163319</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Truebiscuit</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163319@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Bit of an old joke. 'Why is there only one Monopolies Commission?' is at least 10 this year.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Midnight Dreary on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163318</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Midnight Dreary</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163318@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I like it - kind of seems like a funnier version of today's front page.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dvo4fun on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163315</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvo4fun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163315@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Yep!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Golgo13 on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163300</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Golgo13</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163300@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Excellent.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yikes on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163294</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Yikes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163294@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Nice!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Iggy Pop-Barker on "Adam Smith Institute Competes with Itself"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56507#post-163291</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Iggy Pop-Barker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">163291@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Free market think-tank the Adam Smith Institute has been split into a dozen competing Adam Smith Institutes as a result of a ruling by the Competition Commission. The Commission found that the Institute, as the only one with that name, was exercising an anti-competitive monopoly.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;A Commission spokesperson said: “We believe in giving consumers a wide range of choices when it comes to reports advocating free market solutions to social and political problems.  In fact we were disappointed that the Institute had not realised this contradiction itself.  We have therefore acted to break it up so that now every researcher is his or her own Adam Smith Institute.  They will all be able to produce competing reports and consumers will be able to pick the ones whose conclusions they like best.”&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The issue may not yet be over.  Peter Forbes, CEO of Adam Smith Institute No.5, has applied to the Competition Commission to rule that it has acted anti-competitively by being the only Competition Commission.  
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
