<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=54321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156846</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156846@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I don't know what the protocol is when something is identified as a duplicate. Do I edit the title to be duplicate or just leave it to die gracefully ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>flyerblade on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156838</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>flyerblade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156838@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.designerclothing247.com/burberrycap.jpg&#34;&#62;Burberry cap&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This sort of thing with 1% on the front or something ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>flyerblade on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156837</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>flyerblade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156837@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I think it needs to be a Burberry cap TBH
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinnick on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156828</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sinnick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156828@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'd forgotten I'd commented on the older sub - still, I can enjoy things more often in my old age.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Like the pic, Bourbon, but shouldn't the &#34;H&#34; be a &#34;V&#34; ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156826</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156826@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;ahhhh. I searched first as well. I'll have to learn to search better.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bourbon on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156825</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bourbon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156825@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;William Hague sponsors new benefit cap&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00090/ed_imgSNN2102W_90677a.jpg&#34;&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>waylandsmithy on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156824</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>waylandsmithy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156824@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Already been done:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=38012#post-107391&#34;&#62;benefit caps&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boutros on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156822</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Boutros</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156822@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Lovely word, scroungers!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156821</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156821@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I like that .. I'll change it to that .. thanks ..
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinnick on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156820</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sinnick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156820@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Still just slightly contrived.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Stars anyway&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;How about &#34;Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps&#34; ?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156817</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156817@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;It was difficult to squeeze it into a snappy headline. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Possibly&#60;br /&#62;
MPs vote benefit caps for the top 1% scroungers to wear&#60;br /&#62;
?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boutros on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156816</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Boutros</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156816@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Great idea. Can the headline be simplified? Too many 'to's' for me.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156813</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156813@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Feel free ! ...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>flyerblade on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156811</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>flyerblade</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156811@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Just been thinking along the same lines - was going to mock up one of the caps too ;-)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Not Amused on "Top 1% of scroungers to wear benefit caps"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54321#post-156803</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Not Amused</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">156803@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;more caps soon ...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Changed as per Sinnick's suggestion from:&#60;br /&#62;
MPs vote to give benefit caps for the top 1% unemployed to wear to identify them
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
