<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=54031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Yikes on "Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031#post-155904</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Yikes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">155904@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Could make a joke about  this joke ... &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;'Gullible' back in the dictionary after viral Facebook petition
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tripod on "Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031#post-155894</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Tripod</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">155894@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;blockquote&#62;And I thought I'd made it up! &#60;/blockquote&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Nah... that's just gullibility...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>apepper on "Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031#post-155893</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>apepper</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">155893@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;And I thought I'd made it up!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tripod on "Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031#post-155892</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Tripod</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">155892@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Have you had this joke carbon-dated?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>apepper on "Microsoft scandal - &#34;gullible&#34; missed out of Word dictionary"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=54031#post-155890</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>apepper</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">155890@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Users of the latest version of Microsoft Word have spotted problems with the Word spell checker; the common word &#34;gullible&#34; was missed out. One user complained; &#34;If 'gullible' is missing, what's next? 'sucker' or 'naive'? I use those words most days.&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
