<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=48309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>rikkor on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139193</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rikkor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139193@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;It would have been more believable if her name were Mitzi or Beryl or something.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinnick on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139121</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sinnick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139121@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;She must have been a minger if he didn't mention her.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MADJEZ on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139106</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MADJEZ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139106@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48316&#34;&#62;Ancient scroll shows Mary Magdalane hid marriage to Jesus to get council house.&#60;/a&#62; another nil star effort.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DustyBinLaden on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139047</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DustyBinLaden</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139047@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Daily Mash already leading with a cracker
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rikkor on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139044</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rikkor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139044@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Someone more clever than I could take the fragmentary text and put all sorts of laff riotous words around it.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>charlies_hat on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139042</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>charlies_hat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139042@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;It's a papyrus typo. He was moaning about his Wifi.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>simonjmr on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139039</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>simonjmr</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139039@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Jesus has just had a lovely supper in the garden of Gethsemane. Promised that stunning views are nailed on for tomorrow
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gregle on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139038</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gregle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139038@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;There must be potential for an article about evidence of some fictional character having a hidden wife after all. Or maybe the pope starting to shop around now that it looks like Jesus was getting a bit of action (or not if he was married)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ianslat on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139036</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ianslat</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139036@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Why didn't the early christians just check his Facebook status?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>button on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139031</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>button</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139031@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I had just read it Simon, and came here to post pretty much exactly the same as you. Jim West's statement takes the biscuit.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinnick on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139030</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sinnick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139030@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Jim West's own statement isn't proof of anything, either. Nor is your statement, nor is mine.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>simonjmr on "Ancient fragment makes reference to the &#039;wife of Jesus&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=48309#post-139029</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>simonjmr</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">139029@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Anybody else seen this?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19645273&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19645273&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Especially :&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Jim West, a professor and Baptist pastor in Tennessee, said: &#34;A statement on a papyrus fragment isn't proof of anything. It's nothing more than a statement 'in thin air', without substantial context.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Surely his argument also invalidates the whole of the bible, and any other religious document??&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;More soon
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
