<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Sherlock Holmes v Predator panned by critics as not inkeeping with Conan Doyle</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=4731</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=4731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Basil_B on "Sherlock Holmes v Predator panned by critics as not inkeeping with Conan Doyle"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=4731#post-13241</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Basil_B</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">13241@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Criticism that the follow up to the new Sherlock Holmes movie is going to far from the original Arthur Conan Doyle books seems justified in view of the title of the follow up film due out in the Autumn.&#60;br /&#62;
Spokesman for the director of the film tried in vain to placate the critic's by suggesting that ' we could change the title to Sherlock Holmes v The Hound of the Baskervilles. But we thought that would be even more far fetched when the hound turns out to be a homocidal maniac alien that can kill people in an instant by means of a shoulder mounted laser gun'.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
