<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: No Cock Shock on Embarrassing Bodies</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44824</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=44824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Njinski on "No Cock Shock on Embarrassing Bodies"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44824#post-128291</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Njinski</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">128291@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;The switchboard at Channel 4 rang red hot last night after hoards of viewers phoned to complain about the distinct lack of tenuous Penis and vaginal related illnesses on the latest episode of Embarrassing Bodies. The omission of unsolicited full frontal cock and minge shots from the programme left many viewers feeling aggrieved. A C4 spokesman said ‘Unfortunately an oversight in the editing suite meant this week’s programme focused on genuine illness rather than the pre-watershed soft porn content that we usually serve up’. The TV Ombudsman has agreed to censure C4 about their future conduct.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
