<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=44069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>butagirl on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126202</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>butagirl</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126202@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Top drawer stuff. This MUST make FP!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Duff on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126156</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Duff</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126156@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I put it to you Mr Giant...that this story is very good indeed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rizzo on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126118</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rizzo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126118@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;nice one
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tedweasel on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126111</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tedweasel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126111@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Followers will have one last chance this Summer when 'Total Can't Recall' appears in UK cinemas.&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;img src=&#34;http://i1218.photobucket.com/albums/dd418/barryted/recall.jpg&#34;&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dvo4fun on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126110</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvo4fun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126110@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;And that, Ladeez an Gemmum, is how to do it. Cracking top notch job VCG
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ronseal on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126101</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ronseal</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126101@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I love the idea, but I'm secretly envious, because my version  never took off!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42789#post-122373&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42789#post-122373&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ronseal on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126100</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ronseal</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126100@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;What about if Leveson jumps over a shark?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Or there could be one of those Xmas Specials, with loads of guest stars.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vertically Challenged Giant on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126097</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vertically Challenged Giant</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126097@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Simon – I don’t think that really fits with this angle because I’m saying it’s being cancelled due to not being popular.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It’s a great idea in its own right though – Sky buying up the rights, refusing to let anybody else report on it and showing it on some really obscure channel that nobody receives. Or charging an extra £8,000 a month for subscription to the Sky Leveson channel.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ted – you’re too kind.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>simonjmr on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126092</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>simonjmr</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126092@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Could you add in that like all popular programmes in the UK, its being bought by Sky and will be shown exclusively on Sky Enquiry ???
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tedweasel on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126091</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tedweasel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126091@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Up to your exceptional high standard VCG.&#60;br /&#62;
Love the train crash.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vertically Challenged Giant on "Leveson inquiry faces chop due to dwindling viewing figures"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=44069#post-126090</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vertically Challenged Giant</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">126090@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Latest reports are claiming that the Leveson inquiry will not be returning to our screens for a second season as viewing figures continue to fall. The show launched in the latter stages of 2011 amidst a blaze of publicity but has failed to capture the imaginations of the British public, consistently being outperformed by Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women, and now looks set to be pulled after just one series.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;‘The BBC News channel has been struggling for some time to compete with the likes of ITV1 and Challenge TV in the daytime market.’ said Mark Thompson of TV Times, ‘The Leveson inquiry was supposed to be their flagship show, to reinvigorate the channel and bring in new viewers, but they haven’t really done enough to keep the format fresh, they’ve had some thoroughly unlikeable characters and it’s all gone rather stale.’&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Bosses at the BBC have not confirmed rumours of the show’s demise, but the news has not come as a surprise to some fans from its early days, who have criticised recent storylines as being ‘too far-fetched’.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;‘It was good to start with and I thought we might see Murdoch hit with another pie or something, but it really tailed off and got a bit dull. And the whole ‘mass amnesia’ storyline is even more ridiculous than some of what they came up with in the later series of Lost.’ complained Terry Watkins, an avid viewer, ‘TV shows have had memory-loss storylines before and they can be really good if they’re done well, but this just felt a bit amateurish.’&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Mr Watkins feels that the downfall has been partly due to poor casting, pointing to the central Leveson character’s lack of menace and claiming that somebody ‘scarier’ would have been better for the role.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;‘I think one of the Dragons from Dragon’s Den would have been a better fit, or even Jeremy Paxman You know, somebody who could unsettle people a bit more. Some of the roles were spot on though; Tony Blair’s portrayal of a war criminal desperately trying to evade the law was brilliant, right down to the haunted look in his eyes that hints at the demons of his past.’ continued Watkins, ‘But whoever was responsible for the decision to cast Nick Clegg as deputy Prime Minister needs their head examining.’&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;‘If they are going to finish it I hope that something spectacular happens, a train crashing into the building like in Coronation Street or something. I’d hate to see it end with David Cameron waking up to find it’s all just been a bad dream.’
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
