Forum » Topic: God forced to admit that network omnipotency actually only 99.3% http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42659 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Tue, 21 May 2013 18:04:49 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php Scroat on "God forced to admit that network omnipotency actually only 99.3%" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42659#post-122022 Thu, 10 May 2012 11:13:27 +0000 Scroat 122022@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Hello again Exigo. Nice one - have some stars. </p> <p>Would have preferred Bracknell or Reading to Swindon. No, Swindon's shite too come to think. </p> rickwestwell on "God forced to admit that network omnipotency actually only 99.3%" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42659#post-121998 Thu, 10 May 2012 10:45:54 +0000 rickwestwell 121998@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Good to see you back, exigo. Here's a NiB, NiB editor! </p> exigo on "God forced to admit that network omnipotency actually only 99.3%" http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=42659#post-121908 Wed, 09 May 2012 18:44:12 +0000 exigo 121908@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>God today put out an unexpected press release confirming that rather than being completely omnipotent, holy coverage is actually around 99.3%. This has been attributed to blackspots in some of Englands darker backwaters, including the Mersey Tunnel, London's Underground and Swindon.<br /> Commentators were quick to note that this percentage puts it behind both T-Mobile and o2 - meaning in many places, if you want your prayers answered, you're better off sending a text. </p>