http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Wed, 22 May 2013 01:29:40 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102752 Sun, 25 Dec 2011 07:11:26 +0000 Chuts 102752@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>People come here for a social life? How terribly sad. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102731 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:52:52 +0000 Sinnick 102731@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Explanation not needed, just enjoying the craic.</p> <p>I'm not sure about 'social' - can get a tad 'antisocial' on occasion, but hey-ho. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102730 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:48:18 +0000 waylandsmithy 102730@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>A little. It's a different style though: has to be more topical and normally 'straighter'. And they sometimes let you slag off Stewart Lee.</p> <p>I figured it was a good way of continuing to write daily, without flooding the board here. Both sites are great, but I enjoy the 'social' side here. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102728 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 22:33:57 +0000 Sinnick 102728@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>5* don<br /> unfortunate parallel evolution of ideas</p> <p>so, smithy, you two-timing us? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102684 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:34:49 +0000 donsayers 102684@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Bugger! </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102661 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:10:12 +0000 waylandsmithy 102661@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Nicely written, sadly some arse got in first:<br /> <a href="http://newsthump.com/2011/12/23/julian-assange-defends-release-of-santas-%e2%80%98naughty-list%e2%80%99-on-wikileaks/">Wikileaks</a> </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102659 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:53:48 +0000 Perks 102659@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Nice first piece. Like '.......worried what the cia,mi5 or toys r us would do with the data'<br /> 5 stars </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=36625#post-102658 Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:47:54 +0000 donsayers 102658@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yesterday Wikileaks published the entirety of Santas “naughty-list” complete with data from his satellite navigation system.</p> <p>As demonstrated on last night’s BBC Panorama programme, using this data it is possible to identify the name and home address of every bad child in the world.</p> <p>Parents of children on the list have today, been expressing their anger at the leak: Mrs Ellison-Smyth from Chipping Norton said that she has given her nanny notice as it was “Obviously the nanny’s fault” that her little angels were on the list”. Mrs Brown from Billericay feared that her little Arun and Shuvawn would get bullied when they returned to school without the latest iPhones that they had asked for.</p> <p>Other more articulate parents wondered if the list had been double checked and expressed the fear that their children would be disadvantaged for life by being on the list. Others worried as to what the CIA, MI5 and Toys-R-Us would do with the data.</p> <p>Interviewed today a spokesman for “Wikileaks said that it was entirely possible that the children would be disadvantaged but said that this was “Just fucking tough”. </p>