<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=32631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>John Ffitch-Rucker on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-93001</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>John Ffitch-Rucker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">93001@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Does this mean Bryson didn’t capture an enigma machine from a German submarine? How disappointing.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Des Custard on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92998</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Des Custard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92998@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;It dived on its first outing and never resurfaced, but I knew roughly where to look.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Clarky on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92994</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Clarky</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92994@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;You keep your subs for 3 years? How organised!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Des Custard on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92993</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Des Custard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92993@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Then in the 70s they made the old sub smaller and came up with the sub-compact.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So I dimly remember.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dvo4fun on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92986</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvo4fun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92986@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Ford used to do that in the 1950s. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So I'm told
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Des Custard on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92984</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Des Custard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92984@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Thanks people.  I have to admit that I stole it, but only from myself. In true hack spirit I dusted off a 3 year old sub and grafted on a new front end to make it topical.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dvo4fun on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92955</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvo4fun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92955@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Thank you for illuminating this issue, but you may find these stars help also.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drylaw on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92949</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Drylaw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92949@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hear Hear!  Time for a Bryson backlash.  Who does he think he is?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stan Laurel on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92943</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stan Laurel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92943@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Nice work, Des. That is, if it is your own work ....
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Clarky on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92911</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Clarky</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92911@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;This Waitrose thing - are they sponsoring subs? Nice piece Mr C.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Golgo13 on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92904</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Golgo13</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92904@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Like it  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;...and I like a bit of hairy pie myself, now and again, so I can empathise with Rory McGrath. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think the biggest mistake you can make with Bryson books is to read two of them close together. One is fun, but you just get sick of his smuggery. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Like when you're about halfway through your second tube of Pringles and you realise you should have stopped at one tube.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Des Custard on "Film casts new doubt on authorship of Bill Bryson’s &#039;Shakespeare&#039;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32631#post-92876</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Des Custard</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">92876@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Following new doubts raised by the film 'Monotonous', an account of the life of Bill Bryson, a leading scholar has entered the fray with his views on the true authorship of Bill Bryson’s book 'Shakespeare', which has sold millions and has been translated into 134 languages.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Professor AN Milton said it was simply inconceivable that a self-taught small-town American from Des Moines, Iowa, whose father used to take the family on holiday in a blue Rambler station wagon, could have sufficient appreciation of the society in which Shakespeare moved, or of the subtleties and nuances of his work, to be able to write such a convincing narrative. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;'I’ve nothing against Bryson,' he said, 'and I’m quite willing to believe he could pen the odd travel piece or organise a litter campaign, but beyond that he is not the man that he would gladly make show to the world he is. The true author has to be another.' &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;First on the list of possibles is Clive Anderson, who as a barrister and television personality has demonstrated his complete ease with the English language. He shares Shakespeare’s love of the double entendre, and is known to be unable to say ‘Coriolanus’ without smirking. 'You can see him aching to show the world he’s not just a clever twit,' said Milton, 'and writing this book would provide a release for some of that suppressed talent, even if he were contractually unable to take the credit.'&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Another strong contender is Australian writer and broadcaster Clive James, whose admiration for Shakespeare’s iambic pentameter is unsurpassed. Known for his witty and complex writing, Clive made the move in mid-career from television critic to presenter, where he found the only limit to the length of his sentences was the requirement to breathe occasionally.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But the favourite, despite not being called Clive, is hairy pie eating Rory McGrath, with his mastery of refined and vulgar English in all its forms from Geoffrey Chaucer to Paddy McGuinness. Milton said McGrath had it all: the education, the showmanship, the common touch, and above all a sufficiently convincing resemblance to Bryson to be able to fool the critics.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Bryson himself was unavailable for comment, but his personal assistant said he was having a typically Shakespearian day: shopping at Waitrose, going to the library, having tea with the vicar and riding his bicycle to the red pillar box to post a letter to the Times.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
