<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: &#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=32327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Vertically Challenged Giant on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91935</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vertically Challenged Giant</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91935@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;dvo - no way of telling for sure who has voted for what, but people generally leave a comment with a rating at the moment. So if a sub has got 5* and no comments there's a reasonable chance that the writer has awarded those stars. Especially if they appeared within 12 seconds of the sub being posted.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Everybody likes to get stars, and, in defence of anybody that does it, the text at the top of the writers' room does actually include the line &#34;so if you would like to write for NewsBiscuit please post your article on this submission board and then attempt to give yourself maximum votes over and over again&#34;, so people are only following orders.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Giving everything you sub 5* does tend to wind some people up on here though, as I discovered quite early on. So I stopped doing it. Honest, I did...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dvo4fun on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91924</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvo4fun</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91924@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;How does that work then? Is there a way to identify who has voted for what? (You'll be telling me there's a way to identify browsing history next).
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>apepper on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91901</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>apepper</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91901@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Handy tip; I obviously want to vote for myself, but not appear to.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vertically Challenged Giant on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91883</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Vertically Challenged Giant</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91883@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Sound advice Al. Alternatively you could wait until somebody else gives you stars, then give yourself 5 afterwards. Not so obvious then either. And then any sub that sinks has no stars, so if anybody accuses you of giving yourself 5 you can point to the no star subs as evidence that you don't do that kind of thing.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Not that this is something I'd do you understand, just saying you could, if you were that way inclined.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Al OPecia on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91820</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Al OPecia</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91820@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;If I were you, I'd wait for at least ten minutes before voting for yourself to make it look less obvious.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>apepper on "&#34;Most crime is committed by undercover police&#34;"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=32327#post-91819</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>apepper</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">91819@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;In a shock revelation, it appears that the majority of crime in 2010 was actually committed by undercover police officers.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;We were acting from the best of motives.&#34;, explained a police spokesman, &#34;I'm sure that the public is reassured to know that criminals aren't behind most crimes.&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
