<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forum &#187; Topic: BBC &#34;clearly overfunded&#34; says Nick Clegg</title>
		<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=2178</link>
		<description>The NewsBiscuit Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/rss.php?topic=2178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>QorbeQ on "BBC &#34;clearly overfunded&#34; says Nick Clegg"</title>
			<link>http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=2178#post-6430</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>QorbeQ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6430@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;The BBC has been forced to defend itself this morning against a backdrop of &#34;excessive&#34; and &#34;unnecessarily intrusive&#34; election coverage following accusations of a &#34;spendthrift&#34; attitude.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;The BBC simply have too many spare resources if they can keep a watch on all of the potential MPs twenty-four hours a day&#34;, said Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats. &#34;It was always an ill-advised plan to run live election coverage on anything but polling day itself as there were never going to be enough soundbites, quotes or interesting events to keep a whole department busy throughout each day, let alone the small hours. They must have money to burn.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;BBC officials have justified their actions, but have agreed to tone down their policy of 100% candidate monitoring. &#34;We admit that in some cases we have overstepped the mark&#34;, said a spokesperson. &#34;Posting snippets of intimate bedroom activities was probably a bad idea but we stand by our plans to change the swing-o-meter to a toilet-trip-o-meter each evening&#34;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
