http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Sat, 25 May 2013 15:06:52 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-5002 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:54:23 +0000 The All New Jeni B 5002@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Those appeared when Scroat posted his Political Correctness thread. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4987 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:22:27 +0000 Stan Laurel 4987@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>There have been a lot of gay dating adverts "up top" since this thread was started. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4977 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:51:45 +0000 StoopyDeGunt 4977@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Rikkor, I always said someone should bust your ass.</p> <p>By the way, challenging the government of this web site makes you sond dangerously like a goddamn communist. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4976 Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:23:57 +0000 sauce 4976@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>There's always the <blockquote>quote</blockquote>feature, Rikkor. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4974 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:59:03 +0000 Quaz 4974@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Rikkor, I just checked the "Family Doctor" book and if your ass has turned into a simile or a metaphor then you need to put it in a bag with some crushed ice and milk and take it to Sigmund Freud. He can sow it back on or tell you that you have a fixation with something or other that he just made up. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4971 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:33:05 +0000 thisisall1word 4971@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <br /> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4970 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:31:25 +0000 thisisall1word 4970@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Oh - and [indent] bbcode tags don't work to achieve that... in case you was wondering. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4969 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:30:38 +0000 thisisall1word 4969@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>[indent]I miss the shrinking width of paragraphs that end up stacked against the right hand side of the screen like the withered end of a bell curve against the x axis.</p> <p>It's not the same but you could begin a retort or reply with RE:[/indent] </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4966 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:22:46 +0000 rikkor 4966@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>The ass is a metaphor. Or a simile. Or something like that. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4960 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:08:54 +0000 Quaz 4960@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yes, the old indents were quite useful. Mind you, I often ended up postinf on the end of the wrong comment.</p> <p>I'm really getting quite concerned about your ass Rikkor, you should see a Doctor about that. I think you now have free access to ass Doctors in the US ;-) </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4958 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:06:28 +0000 rikkor 4958@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Vous etes so right! Pointlessness needs to be quick and proximate to maintain its fresh pointlessness. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4942 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:05:59 +0000 The All New Jeni B 4942@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I agree Rikkor. (Not a sentence I expect to write too often)<br /> That's what I miss most about the old format chat.<br /> There's been quite a few times when I've gone to respond to a post only to realise that there are other comments below it, and that to reply would be totally out of context, and therefore even more pointless than normal. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=1754#post-4937 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:01:06 +0000 rikkor 4937@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>No, sorry. That was just to grab your attention. I don't really have any phantom illnesses to whine about.</p> <p>But, in a serious vein, I was thinking of how to improve the chat format. It would be nice to be able to respond to a partcicular comment (that is, the next related comment would be indented below it). Like it used to be.</p> <p>I think this would facilitate more yuck-filled, laff-riot-y type hum(u)or. </p>