http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Wed, 22 May 2013 16:29:31 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32398 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:55:27 +0000 Trini 32398@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I find scoring is best achieved with a sharp craft knife, my old CRT would not have complained like this darned TFT that's started bleeding all over the desk, sod the ass (hmmm), it's a quick squirt and wipe I need... where are the tissues </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32389 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:29:50 +0000 Quaz 32389@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>The only thing wrong with the scoring system is that it fails to reflect my massively over inflated sense of the brilliance of my subs. If it worked correctly then I would already be President of the world. Meanwhile, I will keep taking these painkillers for my ass. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32374 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:54:57 +0000 allmyownstunts 32374@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>right with ya, Sauce </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32361 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:35:35 +0000 la maga 32361@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Mmmm, I do think the scoring system should either be meaningful or got rid of, probably the latter. If you actually like a sub then surely a few seconds to comment on it is better than anonymous starring?</p> <p>You can tell I'm bitter about the number of stars I get can't you? :p </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32360 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:31:05 +0000 sauce 32360@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>There are the occasional sub I'd like to give negative points to - just so even it's author can't up its score.<br /> (Just seen one and now need a cuppa to clear the taste.) </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32350 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:54:57 +0000 rikkor 32350@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Scoring is completely pointless. It gives the masses (all six of them) the completely erroneous belief that they have some say in the process. Everything printed is picked solely by Ed. Whether or not there is a clique of favorites, pay for play, or sex for publishing is involved, who knows or cares? My ass hurts. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32345 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:10:22 +0000 IABP 32345@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>He is the AntiRooney </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32339 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:16:25 +0000 SingingHinny 32339@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I don't come here to score. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32338 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:06 +0000 The All New Jeni B 32338@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Bitching about cliques, cabals, and gangs is the new scoring system. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32337 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:43:38 +0000 IABP 32337@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>On my subs the scoring is broke but I won't complain. I'll wait until it's fixed. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32333 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:28:03 +0000 Phlegm 32333@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I think we're just too busy worrying about the quality of most of the subs. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=11797#post-32306 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:29:33 +0000 Zadok the second 32306@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Does this lack of whinge imply that it's actually working? </p>