http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/tags.php?tag=flounce The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Sat, 18 May 2013 15:11:27 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170213 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:16:04 +0000 Big Ben 170213@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Look it happens to us all. Watch. I'll put one up now and you'll see it won't get any stars, even though I think it's my best one yet. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170193 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:47:29 +0000 Paddy Berzinski 170193@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>If nothing else, I suppose it's a statement of sorts. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170176 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:41:37 +0000 Al OPecia 170176@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Brilliant and insightful - 5 stars. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170172 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:17:05 +0000 The All New Jeni B 170172@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I don't know what your sub was, or if there'd been any comments, but don't take it to heart.</p> <p>I rarely sub (because I'm pretty crap), but when I do, it generally doesn't get a huge amount of stars and slips off the front page pretty quickly.</p> <p>I still enjoy reading what other people post though, and read and take on board other peoples comments too.</p> <p>Like I say, I hadn't read the sub you've deleted, so I can't comment on it but maybe it didn't fit in with any of the formats.</p> <p>And there's always been a one star fairy, but most people ignore the stars anyway in favour of the comments made. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170171 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:06:44 +0000 Bourbon 170171@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>why did they give you 1 star? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170170 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:57:49 +0000 Anonymous 170170@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br /> “Newbie”... Not exactly smartarse. And I'm well aware this is a sad day for the 'regulars'. Just far too many one star morons to make it worthwhile. </p> <p>This place 'aint the same no more.. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170162 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:24:51 +0000 Bourbon 170162@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Did someone forget to hug the newbie? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=58574#post-170121 Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:18:22 +0000 Anonymous 170121@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>message received.. bye bye </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163652 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:15:05 +0000 Audible Minority 163652@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Anyone who provokes 19 comments can't be bad. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163577 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:52:45 +0000 Username 163577@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>@lane-avenger - I have never 1 starred anyone, except someone who posted a gag about a mate's balloon death a few hours after I heard<br /> @lenscap - useful site to know about, if someone has no luck here.<br /> @truebiscuit - don't fully understand your point, but sounds important. what is it please?<br /> @scribbler - who are all the style gurus?<br /> @nickb - eye two ate buns </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163564 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:47:13 +0000 nickb 163564@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I support a pan on buns. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163541 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:04:03 +0000 J Vine 163541@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Scribbler thinks the key to success here is writing innovative not funny material, whereas lane avenger thinks the key is to consistently write the first crap that pops into your head. Of course none of the successful writers spend anytime time thinking about or refining what they post, but why not let us know what you think, after The Wanted and All Time Low... </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163539 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:54:58 +0000 Truebiscuit 163539@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>A total, 100% ban Scribbler? Not a partial 100% ban, or a 34% total ban then?</p> <p>It's not the style you write in that anyone's moaning about Scibbler, it's just that it's all a bit shit.</p> <p>It's called News biscuit, it's a satirical news site. Writing in a different 'style' that avoids humour, clarity or basic fucking grammar is unlikely to catch on.</p> <p>Piss. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163537 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:48:14 +0000 scribbler 163537@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>@Paddy, Have 3 problems with what you say.</p> <p>1. Even supposing that the style police on this site were funny in themselves and represented a core of a funny style that typified the site, the idea that others should try to fit in with it would cause it to progressively narrow and would choke off innovation.</p> <p>2. The self-appointed style police (or talentless territorial bullies as they might be termed) like Lens Cap and Truebiscuit are not actually funny. Go and look at their jokes. They're amongst the least funny people on the planet. (Or what Truebiscuit would call "the fucking planet")</p> <p>3. If you like the average post here, then you're a happier man than me, Gungadin. I think a total 100% ban on puns would be a very good start at improving matters. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163498 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:05:30 +0000 lane-avenger 163498@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163494 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:59:39 +0000 Paddy Berzinski 163494@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Speaking as more of a reader than a writer, I enjoy the vast majority of entries on NB. My impression is that the guidelines give NB a recognisable identity, which is what readers (myself included) have come to expect, and why they keep coming back. It's better to try to fit in with the site style than rebel against it. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163489 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:52:57 +0000 Audible Minority 163489@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Rumour has it that his grandchildren work for a credit reference agency. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163486 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:47:43 +0000 lane-avenger 163486@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Ach! Great Satan I spit on your 'feedback', may your bollocks rot and all your children work for Capita Life and Pensions </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163481 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:43:17 +0000 Audible Minority 163481@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I knew he was full of something and I knew it wasn't humour. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163480 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:40:09 +0000 Lens Cap 163480@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Put that humour into your subs and maybe people will like them.</p> <p> All I am doing is saying what I think is good, and why I think isn't . Anyone can do it. That's the point of the site. It usually works well until people come in and don't like feedback. The problem is theirs not mine </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163479 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:39:32 +0000 lane-avenger 163479@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>is this what you infidels call 'banter' </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163478 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:37:33 +0000 Truebiscuit 163478@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>You die pretty regularly, to be honest. At least every time you post. Lens is going to have his hands full. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163477 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:36:01 +0000 Audible Minority 163477@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Thank you for your explanation, Lens Cap. If I understand correctly then whenever any of us dies, you have power of attorney. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163470 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:29:26 +0000 Lens Cap 163470@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Not biting, just telling you what people do here. You have an issue with that, and that's fine. Although you wouldn't have an issue if I had said brilliant on all your subs and given five stars. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163467 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:26:44 +0000 Truebiscuit 163467@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>This is piss-poor. Some say 'funny' is objective, but sadly 'complete and total shit' is less so. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163462 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:23:24 +0000 lane-avenger 163462@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>No need to bite (although you did) </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163426 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:37:16 +0000 Lens Cap 163426@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I think funny is objective. So if I think something is funny ill day if not ill also say. That's the point of the forum. Spend a bit if time in something, put in some proper jokes and don't flounce if someone doesn't like your stuff and maybe you won't get one star</p> <p>Failing that, go to thespoof.co.uk. Everything gets published without any critique.<br /> <a href="http://www.newsbiscuit.com/about/guidelines-for-contributors/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbiscuit.com/about/guidelines-for-contributors/</a> </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=56542#post-163423 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:33:00 +0000 lane-avenger 163423@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Moderate posters in the borough of NewBiscuit are being upbraided by a group of extremists who believe that only they understand the true meaning of ‘funny’.</p> <p>The extremists, ‘described as a bunch of old men who think they own the place’, have been branding anyone who meets their disfavour with one star in an attempt to oust them from the area.</p> <p>A spoken for the old men said 'We follow the sacred works passed down from Round the Horne, The Goon Show and TWTWTW and must uphold these standards. For example this is yet another shit one from lane-avenger. I’m going to give it one star.’</p> <p>Terry Scott was unavailable for comment. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=53981#post-156225 Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:34:46 +0000 No No Feckin No 156225@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>No,no,feckin no,Oxbridge. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=53981#post-156172 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:00:35 +0000 Dawsons creek 156172@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>The langauge is a bit OTT, I was a bit offened if I'm going to be honest about it. </p>