http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/tags.php?tag=42 The NewsBiscuit Community en-US Thu, 23 May 2013 12:36:21 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/search.php http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-10024 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:25:57 +0000 PluckyMunky 10024@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I love it when you make comments like 'preen, preen', Stunts. You did one, some time ago along the lines of 'waddles, self-importantly to the front'. There are not many things that make me really giggle on here, but those always do. xxx </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-10017 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:48:12 +0000 rickwestwell 10017@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>4 stars to stunts' suggestion. Can't remember what it was she said last week, but just in case. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-10016 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:44:07 +0000 Mr Glover Lover 10016@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>I thought they went</p> <p>* Trainee<br /> ** Cleaner<br /> *** Burger flipper<br /> **** Allowed to speak to customers<br /> ***** McDonalds supervisor </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-10014 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:41:00 +0000 MADJEZ 10014@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Some slight modifications !</p> <p>* I'm glad I didn't post that crap.<br /> ** Good idea, would have been better if Mary or Des had written it.<br /> *** Great, but won't 'over-score' it or it'll knock my sub out of the Top Ten.<br /> **** Bastard, I wish I'd thought of that.<br /> **** Double Bastard, they probably stole it from somewhere else. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9990 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:22:32 +0000 allmyownstunts 9990@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>No need to apologise, Plucky. </p> <p>Love Chigster's 'hit' or 'miss' suggestion - doesn't it kind of, well, solve the whole scoring issue? But then what would we moan about? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9987 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:04:38 +0000 MrChigleysAunt 9987@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>How about giving the forum a nice 50's feel with just "Hit" or "Miss"? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9950 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:11:03 +0000 Mary Evans 9950@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>* What to give everyone</p> <p>Oh shit... </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9934 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:20:56 +0000 Scroat 9934@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>* Baggershate<br /> ** WTF?<br /> *** Maybe<br /> **** Titter<br /> ***** Mutt's nuts </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9925 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:57:14 +0000 PluckyMunky 9925@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Sorry, I read that as 'Can we improve on Stunts' definitions.' My apologies, Stunts. Bless you. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9923 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:49:28 +0000 PluckyMunky 9923@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>*-not nice<br /> **-not very nice<br /> ***-quite nice<br /> ****- very nice<br /> *****- very nice indeed </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9918 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:43:37 +0000 edward hack 9918@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>a bit difficult to get anything to work perfectly when the foxes are guarding the chicken pens<br /> some people can go from being a complete embarassment to brilliance from one sub to the next....others are infuriatingly, annoyingly, brilliantly consistent throughout.<br /> some people are brilliant at chat but may not necessarily post many subs - I value and enjoy their contribution as much as the subbers<br /> but stunts has just about nailed it </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9917 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:42:45 +0000 PluckyMunky 9917@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yes, of course we can improve on Stunt's definitions. xxx </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9915 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:36:32 +0000 allmyownstunts 9915@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>preen, preen </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9914 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:35:10 +0000 The All New Jeni B 9914@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Can we implement Stunt's definitions please? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9912 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:30:41 +0000 sauce 9912@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Have five, rather crawly, stars, stunts. </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9908 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:25:36 +0000 allmyownstunts 9908@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Yes, but it's boring. </p> <p>*I wish this person would take the hint and give it a rest<br /> ** Nice bloke, but this sort of standard's never going to blow anyone's frock up, is it?<br /> *** Anyone know the point of giving something three stars? Me neither.<br /> **** Yeah okay, but NOT giving this five stars because of something you said last week<br /> ***** Guys, guys, listen to this... </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9902 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:57:26 +0000 QorbeQ 9902@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Uhhm, no, not for me. Wonder why not. However, that answers me question, tidy like! Ta! </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9899 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:48:06 +0000 Scroat 9899@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Do you not get</p> <p>* Poor<br /> ** Works<br /> *** Good<br /> **** Great<br /> ***** Excellent</p> <p>When you vote? </p> http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/topic.php?id=3448#post-9883 Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:17:41 +0000 QorbeQ 9883@http://newsbiscuit.com/forum/ <p>Not starting a topic on the self-confirmatory nature of celebrity (go for it if ya want), but on those sweet little yellow globs of ratings goodness.</p> <p>Is there a standard definition of what means what? One star could mean 'here, have points', but I've been taking them thusly...</p> <p><code>* I don't get it<br /> ** I get it<br /> *** Made me smile<br /> **** Made me giggle<br /> ***** Proper-job laugh-out-loud funny</code></p> <p>Is they about right, like? </p>